Search

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading global cause of death, emphasizing the need for improved risk stratification beyond traditional tools such as Framingham, ASCVD, QRISK, and SCORE, which show limitations in diverse modern populations. Machine learning methods applied to electronic health records can enhance prediction by capturing complex, high-dimensional, and nonlinear relationships. This systematic review (2017–2022) evaluated machine learning models for cardiovascular risk prediction using EHR data, focusing on discrimination (AUROC, AUPRC), calibration, external validation, and reporting quality including TRIPOD adherence. A PRISMA-compliant search identified peer-reviewed studies applying machine learning to EHR-based cardiovascular risk prediction. Risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST, and narrative synthesis was conducted due to heterogeneity. Twenty-nine studies were included. XGBoost, random forest, and neural networks were the most common models and generally outperformed logistic regression and traditional risk scores in discrimination. However, calibration was infrequently reported, and external validation was limited, often showing reduced performance. Machine learning models demonstrate improved predictive discrimination over conventional risk scores, but limited calibration assessment and weak external validation constrain clinical applicability. Stronger validation frameworks are needed for clinical translation.

Hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) are a common and largely preventable complication in ICU patients, affecting 5–15% of cases and contributing to increased morbidity and healthcare costs. Despite standardized nursing protocols, incidence remains high, highlighting the need for more effective predictive and preventive approaches. While traditional tools like the Braden Scale offer interpretability, they lack sufficient predictive accuracy in critically ill populations. In contrast, machine learning models such as XGBoost and random forests improve prediction but function as black boxes, limiting clinical trust and actionable insight. To address this gap, this work proposes an Explainable Boosting Machine (EBM) framework trained on electronic health record (EHR) data from over 50,000 ICU admissions (2017–2023). EBMs combine strong predictive performance with interpretability by modeling feature effects through shape functions and capturing pairwise interactions. This allows identification of both global and patient-specific risk factors while maintaining transparency. The framework emphasizes modifiable factors such as repositioning frequency, nutrition, and medical device management, revealing nonlinear thresholds and interaction effects often missed by conventional methods. Overall, the proposed approach integrates accurate prediction with clear, clinically interpretable insights, enabling real-time identification of actionable risk factors for HAPI prevention. By bridging predictive modeling and nursing decision-making, it supports more targeted interventions and improved patient outcomes in critical care settings.

Clinical notes, problem lists, medication orders, and billing codes are core components of the electronic health record. When these components conflict, the record may become less reliable for care delivery, quality measurement, and reimbursement. Current inconsistency detection is largely manual, episodic, and dependent on documentation audits. This approach is difficult to scale across encounters, specialties, and longitudinal records. This article proposes a deep learning NLP model for detecting contradictions among clinical notes, problem lists, medication orders, and billing codes. The goal is to support continuous documentation integrity surveillance. The proposed model uses transformer-based encoders for clinical text and embedding layers for structured coded fields. Cross-attention mechanisms align concepts across EHR modules before classifying consistency relationships. Conceptually, the model could surface discrepancies such as a diagnosis documented in a note but absent from the problem list, or a billing code unsupported by physician documentation. Its output would include an inconsistency category and an interpretable explanation for clinician review. A unified NLP model for cross-module inconsistency detection could improve EHR trustworthiness, documentation quality, and clinical audit workflows. Such a system should be evaluated prospectively before operational deployment.

Hospital length-of-stay is a central operational metric for inpatient capacity planning, discharge coordination, and resource allocation. Accurate prediction remains difficult because patient trajectories are heterogeneous, nonlinear, and shaped by evolving clinical events during admission. Traditional statistical models often have limited flexibility for high-dimensional and sequential electronic health record data. Across the literature, there is no settled consensus regarding optimal model architecture, feature representation, validation design, or clinical implementation strategy. This systematic review synthesizes machine learning approaches for hospital length-of-stay prediction published from 2017 to 2022. It focuses on EHR feature types, model architectures, validation methods, interpretability strategies, and reported operational outcomes. A structured review of peer-reviewed literature was conducted using targeted search strings related to machine learning, deep learning, electronic health records, discharge prediction, and hospital length-of-stay. The review included studies across emergency, inpatient, surgical, pediatric, cardiovascular, and intensive care settings. The literature suggests that gradient boosting, random forest, ensemble learning, and recurrent neural networks are common approaches for LOS prediction. However, external validation remains uncommon, prediction horizons vary widely, and operational implementation outcomes are reported less consistently than model development results. Future research should prioritize external validation, prospective implementation studies, standardized outcome definitions, and transparent reporting of workflow barriers. Shared benchmarking datasets and multi-center validation consortia would strengthen comparability across LOS prediction studies.

Care coordination failures include missed referrals, lost follow-ups, fragmented communication, and incomplete transitions between primary and specialty care. These failures can delay diagnosis, weaken continuity, and increase avoidable utilisation. Existing detection approaches often depend on manual review, retrospective audits, or simple rule-based flags. Such approaches are poorly suited to capture the relational complexity of patient, provider, referral, messaging, and encounter networks. This article develops a conceptual graph-based machine learning model for predicting care coordination failures. The model represents patient–provider referral networks enriched with follow-up status, patient message activity, specialty access delays, and provider communication patterns. The proposed approach uses a heterogeneous graph neural network in which patients and providers are nodes. Referral, encounter, and messaging relationships are represented as edges, while node and edge features encode follow-up adherence, message frequency, wait-time signals, and communication context. Conceptually, the model would identify high-risk referral edges that combine delayed access, incomplete follow-up, weak messaging activity, or limited provider communication. These predictions would support coordinator review before a referral becomes a documented care gap. A graph-based model could shift care coordination from reactive tracking toward predictive prevention. By identifying fragile referral relationships early, it could support more timely outreach and safer continuity of care.