Clinical Intelligence Research Press Clinical Intelligence Research Press

Search

Search results:
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Systems Governance, Safety, and Accountability
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has emerged as a transformative force in healthcare systems, enabling advanced analytics, personalized interventions, and streamlined governance frameworks. This narrative review synthesizes recent literature on GenAI’s integration into healthcare infrastructures, emphasizing systems governance, safety protocols, and accountability mechanisms. We explore how GenAI enhances clinical decision-making, data analytics, and closed-loop systems while addressing ethical, regulatory, and operational challenges.At the core of healthcare systems, GenAI facilitates intelligent analytics by generating synthetic data for training models, simulating patient outcomes, and optimizing resource allocation. Governance frameworks are critical for ensuring responsible deployment, with studies highlighting the need for institutional guidelines that mitigate risks such as bias amplification and data privacy breaches. Safety considerations encompass algorithmic transparency, error detection in generative outputs, and human oversight in clinical loops. Accountability extends to lifecycle management, from model development to post-deployment monitoring, as evidenced by global initiatives and regional models like those in the GCC.The review delineates the landscape of GenAI applications in healthcare analytics, including predictive modeling for chronic disease management and real-time decision support. We propose an original systems-level framing that integrates data ingestion, inference generation, intervention deployment, and feedback recalibration under governance umbrellas. This synthesis reveals gaps in current infrastructures, such as the lack of standardized AI guardians for information overload and the challenges of scaling enterprise AI.In examining intelligent clinical decision systems, we highlight architectures that fuse GenAI with electronic health records (EHRs) for closed-loop operations, where generative models inform adaptive interventions. Ethical considerations are woven throughout, advocating for principles adapted from military contexts to healthcare. The adoption of GenAI in US hospitals underscores its potential for inpatient summaries and chronic care, yet calls for regulatory oversight to align with Helsinki declarations.Ultimately, this review positions GenAI as a cornerstone for accountable healthcare systems, urging interdisciplinary collaboration to balance innovation with safety. By synthesizing governance models, safety protocols, and accountability structures, we provide a roadmap for sustainable integration, fostering equitable health outcomes in an AI-augmented era.
Journal of Artificial Intelligence for Healthcare Systems
Review | Open access | 20 July 2025 | Article: 42
Filters
Clear All

Subject
AI-driven Diagnostics Artificial Intelligence in Health Informatics Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Big Data in Healthcare Clinical Data Mining Clinical Decision Support Systems Clinical Informatics Computer Vision Connected Health Systems Deep Learning Digital Health Digital Healthcare Innovation Digital Transformation in Healthcare Electronic Health Records Ethical AI in Healthcare Explainable AI Health Data Analytics Health Data Privacy Health Informatics Health Information Management Health Information Systems Health System Optimization Health Technology Assessment Healthcare Data Science Healthcare Informatics Healthcare Information Security Healthcare Management Healthcare Management Information Systems Intelligent Medical Systems Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) Interoperability in Healthcare Systems Machine Learning Medical Data Analytics Medical Data Management Medical Imaging Mobile Health (mHealth) Natural Language Processing Precision Medicine Predictive Analytics Remote Patient Monitoring Smart Healthcare Systems Telemedicine Wearable Health Technologies e-Health




Access type